Biden:1Impeachment Investigation the Votes to Formalize Now

Ranjana

Biden impeachment investigation despite the lack of evidence.

Biden:1Impeachment Investigation the Votes to Formalize Now

House GOP votes to formalize the Biden impeachment investigation despite the lack of evidence.

Biden impeachment investigation despite the lack of evidence.
Biden impeachment investigation despite the lack of evidence.

 

Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), who was speaker at the time, started the investigation without a vote in September, but it hasn’t been able to substantiate the GOP’s allegation that Biden profited financially from his son’s foreign investment transactions.

Nonetheless, Republicans overwhelmingly supported Speaker Mike Johnson’s (R-La.) motion, which was prompted by the president’s son Hunter Biden’s defiance of a congressional subpoena in the investigation on Wednesday.

The eighth president to be the subject of an impeachment investigation is Joe Biden.

By a vote of 221-212, the measure passed with no Democratic vote in favor
Biden impeachment investigation despite the lack of evidence.
Biden impeachment investigation despite the lack of evidence.

 

Democrats used the House floor prior to the vote to criticize Republicans for what they characterized as a conspiracy-driven fishing expedition intended to exact revenge for former President Donald Trump’s two impeachments.

Republicans countered that the president was lying about his involvement in his son’s foreign business dealings and that the administration was obstructing their investigation by not fully complying with the committees’ subpoenas.

Hunter Biden was scheduled to give a deposition, but instead he gave a press conference, according to House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio).

He also stated, “My father was not financially involved in the business,” during that press conference. That is, indeed, a crucial qualification. That hasn’t been mentioned in three years.

All that is known is that Joe Biden was not involved. Now that he is set to be removed from office, his son holds a press conference and claims he had no financial involvement. So, to what extent was it involved?

According to Jordan’s outline of the impeachment investigation given to reporters during a briefing last week, the investigation is based on an unproven accusation that has come to represent the cornerstone of false narratives and conspiracy theories about the alleged wrongdoings of the Biden family.

Biden:T1 Impeachment Investigation the Votes to Formalize Now

Without providing any proof, Republicans have claimed that Joe Biden, while serving as vice president, pushed for the dismissal of Viktor Shokin, the top prosecutor in Ukraine, in order to halt an investigation into the former proprietor of Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company where Hunter Biden was a board member.

That claim has been refuted by former American officials, anti-corruption activists in Ukraine, and even some Republicans.

Within the year-long investigation, House Republicans have also intensified allegations that the Biden administration impeded a Justice Department probe into Hunter Biden’s financial history, however those who have been involved in the case have continuously refuted that testimony.

In a lengthy statement, Biden mocked the vote as a “baseless House Republican impeachment stunt” and chastised them for failing to address inflation, border security, and issues involving Israel and Ukraine.

He stated, “There is a lot of work to be done.” “However, Republicans in Congress are departing for a month without taking any action to address these urgent issues after squandering weeks trying to find a new Speaker of the House and having to expel their own members.”

“Instead of doing anything to help make Americans’ lives better, they are focused on attacking me with lies,” he continued, making reference to the impeachment vote.

Biden:T1 Impeachment Investigation the Votes to Formalize Now

Biden impeachment investigation despite the lack of evidence.
Biden impeachment investigation despite the lack of evidence.

 

Rather Instead of focusing on the pressing tasks at hand, they are wasting time on this petty political stunt, which even Republicans in Congress acknowledge lacks factual support.

Prior to the vote on impeachment, a few vulnerable Republican lawmakers refused to vote in favor of formal articles of impeachment because of the scant evidence that Republican investigators had gathered.

But, Republican lawmakers came together to support the idea of bolstering the House’s legal authority by moving to authorize the investigation with a vote after white house special counsel dick sauber issued a letter on.

November 17 disputing the validity of the investigation and requesting that subpoenas and requests for interviews with Biden family members and White House aides be revoked.

Biden:T1 Impeachment Investigation the Votes to Formalize Now

“The House is going to In an opinion piece that was published on Tuesday morning, Johnson stated, “We are in the strongest legal position to gather the evidence and provide transparency to the American people—we will probably need to go to court to enforce its subpoenas, and opening a formal inquiry — backed by a vote of the entire body.”

At least one Republican expressed skepticism towards the GOP’s year-long probe into Biden prior to the vote.

Representative Ken Buck (Colorado) informed reporters on Tuesday that he was still considering voting no to approve the investigation.

Although Buck stated he did not believe there was any connection between Hunter and Joe Biden’s actions in Ukraine, he did not agree with Sauber’s letter to Congress, which seemed to take a defiant stance against oversight efforts.

“I disagree with what the That’s not based on the Constitution, Buck thought, but that’s what the White House did when they sent back a letter stating, “You haven’t passed an impeachment inquiry so we aren’t going to give you these documents.”

However, I fail to perceive a connection between Joe and Hunter Biden’s actions.
Biden impeachment investigation despite the lack of evidence.
Biden impeachment investigation despite the lack of evidence.

 

I’m incredibly conflicted because I believe there are many valid reasons to fire Viktor Shokin in Ukraine, and none of them have anything to do with Hunter Biden.

Buck, though, decided to approve the formal investigation on Wednesday.

Johnson has attempted to present the vote in a legalistic manner, telling members that he made a “constitutional decision” in order to hold the vote. Additionally, he emphasized that the House is not voting to impeach Biden, but only to carry out the inquiry further.

Johnson stated at a press conference last week, “All the moderates in our conference understand this is not a political decision.” This choice was made by law. This choice is based on the constitution.

Furthermore, it doesn’t matter at this time whether someone supports or opposes impeachment.

The fact that Hunter Biden chose not to appear in his deposition helped Johnson’s case with Republican lawmakers.

Wednesday morning, the president’s son issued a statement from Capitol Hill, restating his willingness to testify in a public hearing associated with the investigation, but stating that.

“Republicans do not want an open process where Americans can see their tactics… or hear what I have to say.”

His legal representatives have cited prior remarks in which Hunter Biden was virtually dared to testify by House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.), and the team has stated that it does not trust,

House Republicans to refrain from leaking his testimony in a biased manner.

Hunter Biden offered to testify in public before the committee over the previous two weeks, but Comer rejected it. On Wednesday, Republicans vowed to move quickly to start the process of holding Comer in contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with their subpoena.

Biden Hunter Comer told reporters outside the empty hearing room where the deposition was scheduled to take place that “does not get to dictate the terms of the subpoena.

” When asked if he had discovered any proof the president had committed crimes or wrongdoing, Comer responded, “some very serious.”
evidence,” he said, going on to describe two instances of bank records that he had previously misrepresented.

The president’s brother James Biden, who has a variety of business ventures and collaborated with Hunter Biden on a deal with Chinese energy executives, has also been a target for House Republicans.

Comer has brought up concerns regarding a $200,000 personal check that Joe Biden received from his brother in 2018. The check was a repayment of a loan that James Biden had received from Joe Biden in the past.

James Biden was previously invited by the committee to do an interview on December 6, but he has not yet shown up. James Biden’s lawyer, Paul J. Fishman, stated that his client “has been in contact with the Oversight Committee staff about their requests.”

Biden:T1 Impeachment Investigation the Votes to Formalize Now

In a briefing, the press secretary for the White House For the most part, Karine Jean-Pierre remained silent when asked about Hunter Biden or his choice to ignore the subpoena.

“I’m just not going to speak to that,” the president responded when asked in general if she believed that congressional subpoenas should be followed. Simply put, I’m not.

She responded, “I just don’t have anything to add,” when asked if the president was still in the same position as he was in 2021 when he said that those who disobey should face legal action from the Justice Department.

Jean-Pierre disapproved of the impeachment investigation as a whole. Referring to it as a “political stunt,” she refuted the idea that the Biden administration hasn’t collaborated with the probe, citing over 40 hours of testimony and 100,000 pages of documents that have been given to investigators.
witness interviews.

“The House Republicans have been pushing for this impeachment without any evidence, and the White House is standing in their way? Pulling off this political ploy?” she asked. “This lacks supporting evidence. Nothing exists. They’re scheduled to return home tomorrow.

How did they get there?
Biden impeachment investigation despite the lack of evidence.
Biden impeachment investigation despite the lack of evidence.

 

With the exception of Hunter Biden, who was indicted this year on gun-related charges in Delaware and tax-related charges in California, most of the individuals contacted by GOP-led committees overseeing the investigation have cooperated in some way or another.

Following the collapse of a tentative plea agreement for Hunter Biden in August, current and former officials involved in the ongoing federal investigation into the senator made appearances for closed depositions.

 

Additionally, David Weiss, the federal prosecutor appointed to act as The president’s son’s special counsel made the uncommon and exceptional decision to make himself available for questioning by Congress prior to the conclusion of the investigation.

In addition, the Treasury Department has provided House GOP investigators with reports on suspicious activity. Subpoenas have been used to obtain bank records, and the National Archives will soon provide 62,000 records from Biden’s vice presidential administration.

These supplement the twenty thousand records the Archives has already made available to the public in response to Comer’s request.

Hunter Biden was hit by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) for missing his scheduled appearance on Wednesday and instead scheduling a press conference to voice his displeasure with the proceedings.

According to Issa, who addressed reporters who were waiting outside the hearing room where the president’s Son was supposed to make an appearance.

The Oversight Committee must give 72 hours’ notice before the resolution can pass the committee and move on to the House floor if Republicans decide to hold Hunter Biden in contempt.

Biden:T1 Impeachment Investigation the Votes to Formalize Now

Unless lawmakers continue to meet through the weekend, it is unlikely that a vote will take place this week.

A number of former Trump administration aides were found in contempt by Congress last year for refusing to comply with subpoenas sent by the House Select Committee looking into the Capitol riot of January 6, 2021.

Jordan was one of the people the committee on January 6 subpoenaed, but he did not show up to testify. The House Ethics Committee was tasked with looking into the matter, but he was not found in contempt of Congress.

Should the House sanction a contempt the Justice Department, which will determine whether to pursue the contempt referral, is the next step in the resolution against Hunter Biden.

A misdemeanor criminal offense, contempt of Congress carries a maximum penalty of one year in jail and a fine of one hundred thousand dollars.

READ MORE:

1. Health and Fitness Tips for You

2. Upcoming New Movies

3. Get New Jobs Directly From Companies FREE Visa

4.Latest News of Cryptocurrency and Bitcoin

5. Real Estate Business for you

6. Latest News

7. Best Insurance Policy for Everyone

READ MORE:

Leave a Comment