Expulsion meaning in Hindi :The 2 Expulsion of George Santos from Congress Vote
Republican from New York, Mr. Santos, is the sixth House member to be expelled in the chamber’s history. After being ejected by his colleagues, he exclaimed, “To hell with this place.”
Santos leaves Capitol Hill following a stormy year.
Following a resounding bipartisan vote by his peers, George Santos, the Republican congressman from New York whose web of deceit and intrigues earned him a 23-count federal indictment and made him a national laughing stock, was dismissed from the House on Friday.
The action relegated Mr. Santos, who throughout his brief political career created connections to the Pulse nightclub shooting in Orlando, September 11, and the Holocaust, to a legitimate position in history: He is the first House expulsion to be removed without first being found guilty of a federal offense or endorsing the Confederacy.
The official Santos House website is currently unavailable. The link takes users to a page on the House Clerk’s website that lists all of the open seats in Congress; Santos’s previous seat is not currently listed.
On Friday afternoon, representatives from the organization that looks after the congressional complex, the Architect of the Capitol, showed up on time to lock up Santos’s House office. Shortly after Santos left the building, C-SPAN captured footage of the work.
When guests arrive at Santos’s Queens office, they snap selfies and bid him farewell.
Beneath a Congressman George Santos awning that will shortly be replaced, the
Several people eager to say goodbye flocked to the former representative’s district office in Queens’ Douglaston neighborhood on Friday.
After Mr. Santos was expelled from Congress, the office—which had served as both the backdrop for television news shots and the staging ground for protests demanding he leave the House after his penchant for lying was revealed—became a gathering place where people were snapping selfies outside.
David Blake, 68, said, “I know he’s in Washington, but I had to be here when it happened.” He drove to the office on Friday and took a picture to remember the occasion. “He was a significant diversion for the Republicans themselves,” Mr. Blake declared, characterizing Mr. Santos’s fabrications as “out of this world.”
62-year-old Michael Foubister, a former HVAC technician,said that Mr. Santos had “duped everybody,” adding that “you reap what you sow.” She had lived in the area for 55 years.
A very New York farewell was given by some passing drivers on Northern Boulevard, outside the office.
John Johnson, sixty, yelled from his car as he was stopped at a light in front of the office, “Good riddance, you piece of crap.”
“I believed Republicans would come to his aid,” he continued. “However, I suppose they realized it at the last minute.”
The director of Mr. Santos’s now-closed office, Mark Woolley, made an effort to reassure his now-closed constituents that they would still have access to the office’s resources.
However, he conveyed the office’s employees’ relief that the months-long conjecture regarding Mr. Santos’s political prospects had finally come to an end.
a conclusion.
He remarked, “For them, this process has been a roller coaster from the moment we arrived.”
That was also the opinion of the constituents who visited the office. A few blocks away Max Landau, 28, claimed to have witnessed firsthand the spectacle that has engulfed Mr. Santos for months.
“We’ve watched the situation unfold over the last year or so,” he stated, calling it “long overdue.”
The 55-year-old Douglaston resident Lydone Anderson said that Mr. Santos ought to have quit months ago.
“He ought to have left by now,” she remarked.
In front of the Westbury Memorial Public Library on Long Island, where Mr. Santos originally planned to hold his first town hall meeting in the district before calling it off Some said earlier this year that they were relieved that Mr. Santos had been removed even though they were unaware of the vote for expulsion.
After 25 years of residence in Westbury, Denise Smith, 66, took aim at Republican leadership for what she perceived as their decision to stand up for Mr. Santos only in order to keep his seat.
The only thing that matters to her is that she doesn’t want another Republican in office, so if that means electing another liar, that’s what they’ll do, she later said.
Republicans downplay worries that Santos’s removal creates a risky precedent.
House Republicans debated the propriety and seriousness of removing one of their own shortly after the vote to remove George Santos.
A large number of Mr. Santos’s Republican backers expressed worry that removing a member before they had been found guilty of a crime could set a risky precedent. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson expressed “real reservations” earlier in the week about ousting Mr. Santos and voted against the resolution.
Republicans disagreed on the removal of George Santos, as shown here.
The decision on Friday to remove Republican former New York Representative George Santos from Congress was met with strong criticism from his peers, including a large number of members of his own party.
Following a federal indictment on fraud charges and a damning report by the House Ethics Committee outlining charges of misconduct and a pattern of lying about almost every aspect of Mr. Santos’ life, almost all Democrats voted to remove him from office.
Following the vote, some people stopped by the former congressman’s field office in the Douglaston neighborhood of Queens to take pictures of the soon-to-be-replaced awning bearing his name.
After 55 years in the area, retired HVAC technician Michael Foubister, 62, claimed Santos had “duped everybody,” stating, “You reap what you sow.”
Despite the fact that Democrats supported Santos’ removal by an overwhelming majority, Bobby Scott of Virginia and Nikema Williams of Georgia voted against the motion.
Al Green of Texas and Jonathan Jackson of Illinois were the other two who voted “present,” choosing not to take a side.
Although she did not believe Santos belonged in the House, Representative Nikema Williams stated in a statement that she did not want to overturn the decisions made by the electorate that put him in office.
“I’llShe declared, “I’ll always be in favor of granting the people their say.”
Next year, Santos will go through a federal trial.
George Santos is up against an even more difficult and risky legal battle in a federal court on Long Island following his dismissal from the House on Friday.
Due to his involvement in several schemes involving his personal and campaign funds, Mr. Santos has been charged with 23 felonies. On all counts, he has entered a not guilty plea.
Santos will no longer be paid his $174,000 salary as a result of his expulsion. Additionally, he won’t get a pension—members must serve five years in order to be eligible for one.
David Blake, 68, traveled to Santos’s field office in Douglaston, Queens, from his Long Island home of New Hyde Park in ten minutes.
upon learning that Santos had been kicked out of Congress. He remarked, “I had to be here when it happened, but I know he’s in Washington.
“The Republicans themselves found him to be a significant distraction.” In honor of the occasion, Blake took selfies in front of his office and referred to Santos’s lies as “off the charts.”
After the vote to remove Santos, Mark Woolley, the director of his office in Douglaston, Queens, tried to reassure voters that they could still come to the office. He conveyed his relief for the employees in the office. He told reporters, “It’s been a ride for them from the moment we arrived and through this process.
” This was Woolley’s first experience as district director; he has held the position for four other representatives.
“I thought it could go either way, and it was up to the House and the members. And this is how it transpired.
Susan Naftol, 60, a resident of New York’s 3rd Congressional District, applauded the decision to remove Santos after witnessing him depart the Capitol.
Along with a group of Long Island voters, she went to Washington to advocate for his expulsion. “It would have created a terrible precedent—that you can lie and cheat your way into office and then maintain your position—if he had been permitted to remain in office. And that is never advantageous.
With Santos out of the picture, the Republican majority is once again where it has been for the majority of the year: 221. Republican Celeste Maloy of Utah was sworn inin on Tuesday, providing the party a boost, following their victory in a special election last week. Republicans now have a three-seat margin of control in the House thanks to Santos’ departure and the 213 Democrats present.
This means they can afford to lose just three votes on any bill that all Democrats vote against.
Democratic governor Kathy Hochul of New York declared that she was ready to fulfill her “solemn responsibility” and call a special election to fill Santos’s seat. Both sides anticipate that the governor will set a February date for the competition.
The first resolution to expel Santos was introduced by Californian Robert Garcia, who claimed to have informed Santos prior to the vote that he harbored “no personal animosity” toward him. Garcia claimed to have told Santos that he is gay, and both men identify as gay.
He was “sad for him” “as a gay person.”
Santos has departed from the Longworth Building, and his office door is locked. However, his top assistant, Vish Burra, stuck his head out when I knocked. When asked about the schedule and strategy for packing up the office, he abruptly closed the door.
There’s a group of people taking selfies outside using the sign on his door.
When a reporter asked Santos if he intended to use the privileges granted to former congressmen to visit the House floor, he responded, “To hell with this place.”
Mike Smith, the president of House Majority PAC, which backs Democratic congressional candidates, sent out two statements in response to Santos’ expulsion.
On squandering in anspecial election: “We will do everything it takes to turn this district blue, and House Majority PAC intends to play a major role in the NY-03 special election.”
Regarding expulsion “New Yorkers in the 3rd Congressional District now have the chance to elect a representative who will serve with integrity and prioritize their communities, following House Republicans’ months-long attempt to shield serial fraudster George Santos from accountability.
” The MAGA Republicans who shielded George Santos are a national disgrace, and House Majority PAC is prepared to go to any lengths to turn this district blue in the next special election.
Inside Santos’s Douglaston, Queens field office, two employees observed the vote being counted on a computer. Reporters were able to see through the window .
Watch as Mark Woolley, his district director, shakes his head and puts his hand to his forehead. He made his way to the back of the office and got ready to make a statement outside.
Gone is George Santos. A dozen contenders are vying for his seat.
Republicans faced a major political headache when George Santos was forced out of Congress on Friday, but it also created a new one: they will now have to defend his vulnerable seat in a special election that will take place early in the following year.
It is anticipated that the New York race will rank among the most costly and well-publicized House off-year competitions in recent memory. It could further erode Republicans’ already razor-thin majority and provide a sneak peek at the larger fight for the House.
command in November of next year.
On the steps of the House, the first-term New York Republicans who have been Santos’s most vocal opponents of the G.O.P. are holding a press conference.
Rep. Nick Lalota informs reporters, “It’s time to move on from George Santos.”
Tom Suozzi, the presumed Democratic nominee in the upcoming special election, has released a statement regarding Santos’s removal. “We need to get past our trivial, politicized, theatrical finger-pointing and focus on the actual issues that Americans are facing,” he declared. “Let’s get this fixed!”.
Representative Anthony D’Esposito, a Republican from Long Island who supported Santos’s removal, declared as he exited the room, “It shouldn’t have come to this.
“George Santos ought to have been responsible for his actions. It was time for him to step down.
We will now genuinely permit the Third Congressionaldistrict to choose a representative—someone they know, someone they can rely on, and someone who will act in the district’s best interests,” he continued.
Santos declined to use his House privileges when asked if he would return. “What makes me want to remain here?”
Santos’s removal creates an extremely competitive House seat in New York.
To fill Santos’s seat, New York Governor Kathy Hochul is anticipated to call a special election early in the following year, most likely in February. She can choose the date for ten days.
As he strode off the House floor, a reporter asked Santos what reaction he was having. The vote belongs to the House. They’ve just created a risky precedent, he cautioned.
A scattering of cheers from the Republican side of the aisle as Speaker Mike Johnson gavels out the House.
Johnson stated that the governor of New York will be informed by the House clerk that a vacancy needs to be filled.
The House is strangely quiet as the gravity of what has happened sinks in.
This is the first time since the Civil War that a member has been removed from the House without a criminal conviction, and it is the sixth time in House history that a member has been expelled.
That is all. Less than a year after taking the oath of office, the gavel falls and New York’s George Santos is banished from the House of Representatives.
As he takes the speaker’s chair, Mike Johnson will deliverthe count.
Santos was recently kicked out of the House (311-114-2). Santos left the room without saying anything.
There are a variety of Republicans who voted against Santos, including swing district representatives, institutionalists, and allies in leadership. In an apparent futile attempt, members of the far right and the leadership are voting to keep him in office.
Regarding expulsion, the Republican Party is divided fairly evenly. Republicans are voting more in favor of sending Santos off than against, with a slight majority voting against.
This is the result that most people, including Santos, had anticipated from this vote, despite some unexpected late-breaking support from the leadership that gave the impression that Santos had a chance of political survival. Santos said to reporters yesterday that he intended to take Saturday off.
And then permanently pack up his apartment in Washington.
Although the vote is still in progress, Santos will lose if Democrats keep voting against him.
Unlike the leadership, nearly ninety Republicans have already voted in favor of removal.
Even though everyone voted to keep Santos in the group, the leadership did not lead the vote.
Several moderate Republicans are voting against the leadership’s wishes and expelling Santos.
Since this is an electronic vote, legislators are exempt from having to state their positions aloud.
On a big screen in the House chamber, their support or opposition is noted by name, so we’ll keep viewers at home informed about the positions of important lawmakers.
Voting has started.
Briefly, Speaker Mike Johnson, who is in favor of preserving Santos
spoke with him as soon as she entered the room.
In case you’re new here, the House is getting ready to cast a vote on the removal of Representative George Santos from New York. The chamber is expected to turn to Santos in a matter of minutes after concluding a separate, unrelated vote on a small business provision.
Press and public galleries are rapidly filling, signaling growing anticipation.
Now, Santos is having a seemingly cordial discussion with Mike McCaul, the chairman of the committee on foreign affairs and a respected member of Congress. It would seem to be auspicious for Santos if we are sitting here poring over tea leaves.
A little math here: The House is composed of 435 members, and A two-thirds majority is required for expulsion. In the event that every voter shows up and casts a ballot, Santos would need to lose 290 votes.
As an aside, Santos is seated in the back of the room, close to the aisle where he and several other conservative lawmakers typically hold court. As he waits for the vote, a few members have stopped by to talk with him.
This weekend, House Republican leaders—who are all gearing up to oppose Santos’ expulsion—are scheduled to attend a significant voter summit in New York City.
If Santos survives with their assistance, it will be an interesting meeting.
Ohio Representative Max Miller, who has charged the Santos campaign with collecting unapproved political contributions onclaims it’s a “total letdown” and “absolutely insane” that House GOP leaders are voting against expelling the New Yorker, citing his and his mother’s credit cards.
Regarding leadership, Mr. Miller remarked, “Look at what they’re going to do to our majority.” “Now that the Republicans are in control, the New Yorkers will defend a man who is attempting to eliminate them all.”
Several members of the House Republican leadership have made it clear that they oppose ejecting George Santos in the final minutes before the vote.
Their example is probably going to have an impact on rank-and-file members who are still struggling with a difficult decision.
As the House vote to remove Santos draws closer, there is a great deal of drama. For days, expulsion seemed likely, butAt the last minute, there are new concerns about the Republicans’ ability to secure the votes required to remove him. It is anticipated that almost all Democrats will vote to remove.
Max Miller of Ohio claimed that Santos’s campaign had charged his and his mother’s credit card for campaign contributions that exceeded the lawful limit and that neither of them had authorized in a letter sent this morning to his House Republican colleagues. He claimed that the plan was the primary factor in his decision to vote “yes” today, which he mentioned in a floor speech yesterday in favor of Mr. Santos’s expulsion. In addition, he claimed that some other congressional Republicans might have also been victims. The allegation has not been independently confirmed by The Times.
George Santos has Made His Formal debut in thechamber of the house.
Santos is dressed in his go-to outfit, a sweater tucked into a blazer.
Currently up for vote in the House is a resolution unrelated to small business lending. Next up is the vote on George Santos’ expulsion, which should start in ten to fifteen minutes.
Teams of TV reporters wait to begin their live hits outside the Douglaston, Queens, field office of George Santos.
Two employees are seated inside the office, which has “Kidnapped” posters all over the windows. The district director of the office, Mark Woolley, stated he had just watched C-SPAN on his computer while waiting for the vote and that he would make comments later.
The No. 4 House Republican, Elise Stefanik, has since released a statement in which she states, “No Member of Congress has ever been expelled without a conviction.”
She is a writer. “I am voting no because I am concerned about due process and this is a dangerous precedent.”
These are the potential candidates for Santos’ special election replacement.
At one point, there were as many as twenty contenders running against Long Island and Queens Representative George Santos for reelection.
However, party leaders anticipate narrowing the field to just two candidates who will compete in a special election early in the following year if he is removed.
Expulsion of a partner
Democrats and Republicans can avoid clumsy primaries for special elections according to New York State regulations. Instead, the candidates will be chosen through a largely behind-closed door process run by the chairmen of the respective parties in Nassau and Queens Counties.
Should Santos prevail in this vote, itis very likely that he will complete the two years left on his term. His supporters contend that he should be tried first, and a trial is not expected to take place until the following autumn. Naturally, he has declared that he will not run for office again.
According to a source close to Representative Elise Stefanik, the top-ranking Republican from New York in the House, she will vote against removing George Santos. Stefanik may be one of several prominent Republican leaders who voted to spare Santos today, having backed his candidacy in 2022.
Additional grounds for dismissal were presented by a damning House ethics report.
Rep. George Santos of New York should have been expelled for good reason, and Congress should have looked to the House Ethics Committee for that information.
Two weeksIn a damning report that was published some time ago, the committee discovered “substantial evidence” that Mr. Santos had broken federal law.
It detailed in great detail how he had embezzled money from donors, paid back loans that never happened, and openly used congressional funds to support his extravagant lifestyle, which included paying thousands of dollars for rent, designer clothes, and Botox injections.
Nobody is entirely sure how the vote will proceed with about 45 minutes to go.
However, some Republican leaders have recently stated that they are against expulsion, which seems to have somewhat counteracted the momentum that followed the publication of the Ethics Committee report.
Expulsion Type Lightning Arrester
Several of Santos’ constituents who traveled to Washington are currently attending a press conference being held outside the House by Democratic congressman from New York, Representative Dan Goldman.
to demand that he be banished. According to Goldman, “We have to establish a standard of who we allow ourselves to be associated with.”
This is how George Santos was shielded for months by two GOP House speakers.
Republicans have had trouble getting along with Representative George Santos ever since he took office.
Many merely declined to collaborate with him. Earlier this fall, there were attempts to remove him, chief among them some of his New York-based colleagues.
However, Mr. Santos managed to hold onto his seat for almost a year despite the disarray of his biography and the mounting criminal charges because of the backing of two successive House Speakers, Kevin McCarthy of California and Mike Johnson of Louisiana.
In roughly an hour, the House is scheduled to vote on the resolution.
to make George Santos leave. However, the result is far from certain. Due to their decision to forego a formal whip count prior to the vote, party leaders in both houses are operating in the dark.
This is how Santos managed to elude the first two attempts at removal.
After being charged with wire fraud, money laundering, and stealing public funds, Representative George Santos was removed from Congress. In May, there was a vote on whether to remove him from office for the first of three times.
Expulsion meaning in bengali
Even though it was obvious that their effort would not succeed in obtaining the two-thirds majority needed to remove a member, House Democrats still introduced the resolution and tried to force a vote.
Santos joins a select, notorious group after being kicked out.
George Santos was expelled from the House of Representatives on Friday.
a Republican from New York, became one of the few disgraced American politicians doomed to that shameful destiny.
According to the Congressional Research Service, only 20 members of Congress—five representatives and fifteen senators—have ever been ousted from office by a vote of their peers.
Who are the worst G.O.P. opponents of Santos? his New York House colleagues.
Few members of Congress have opposed Representative George Santos with the ferocity and unwavering determination of his fellow first-term Republicans from New York.
Expulsion meaning in tamil
The lawmakers have gone well beyond party lines in their criticism of Mr. Santos, even going so far as to call for his resignation. Many of them represent moderate districts.
We expose the falsehoods and unresolved issues in the controversy surrounding Santos.
New York Republican Representative George Santos has told so many lies it’s difficult to keep track of them all.
We enumerated them, raising serious concerns regarding his personal finances as well as the money he raised and spent on his campaign.
READ MORE:
1. Health and Fitness Tips for You
2. Upcoming New Movies
3. Get New Jobs Directly From Companies FREE Visa
4.Latest News of Cryptocurrency and Bitcoin
5. Real Estate Business for you
6. Latest News
7. Best Insurance Policy for Everyone
READ MORE:
- 1. Strategic Management Process: Top5 Jobs In Dubai FREE VISA Apply Now
- 2. Vancouver Time fighting for $12,000 in travel insurance Nightmare FREE
- 3. DIABETIC DIET : A PROFESSIONAL’S GUIDE TO A WARM AND WELL-BEING
- 4. NICOLAS CAGE STATES : HE HAS 3 OR 4 MORE MOVIES LEFT NOW
- 5. EMPRESS CRACKS: FOR THE FIRST TIME SINCE APRIL
- 6. DESPITE MEANING: DESPITE HIGH RATES, MORE US HOME BUYERS ARE WILLING TO BUY
- 7. A 44-YEAR-OLD BOSTON WOMAN WAS KILLED BY A SHARK ATTACK IN THE BAHAMAS WHILE ON VACATION
